Are The Lotr Movies Better Than The Books

August 18, 2022 Post a Comment

The shadow of the past: Tolkien 's book the fellowship of the ring and the peter jackson film screenplay of the same name are fairly easy to document because, in both the book and film, the story maintains a single thread from beginning to end.

Pin de Batleth Klingon en Lord of the Rings Movie Trilogy

The passing of the grey company:

Are the lotr movies better than the books. And wouldn't you know the library only had in the tt, starting my long running theme of. Id say the lotr books is alot better, they have so much depth and lore behind them that is lacking in hp. (the hobbit films are a whole different thing though, ugh.)

Books are better than movies because of limited time. But jackson is the better teller of this particular tale. A short cut to mushrooms:

Movies — why i prefer lotr movies. But hear me out for a minute. Why we think it’s true:

You read at your own pace and in your own time. No, the movies were not better than the books. I can't think of many examples where i found a movie version to be better than the books, and this is no exception.

The movie of the fellowship of the ring vastly simplifies the start. The departure of boromir† minas tirith: There were things that jackson changed that bothered me, too.

He became an obsessive fan and later came up with the idea to make film adaptations. There is a lot in lotr that just couldn't be made into a good movie, imo. The fellowship of the ring:

The books are better, but in my opinion they are more targeted towards adults then the movies were. Lacking somewhat in the book. However it wa a great read and certainly a masterpiece of fantasy (in addition, when it was written, character personalities weren't that.

So far lord of the rings is the only time i felt the movie was better than the book. The publicity materials for film adaptations of. The lord of the rings.

But the bbc radio series did a better job. There is alot of information that is really cool to learn, but it is truly an entire universe so if ur going to read the books my reccomendation would be to get really involved its more fun that way Peter jackson discovered the lord of the rings when he bought a paperback copy to read on a train ride.

The books are so tonally different and i think the movies did the best job they could finding a balance between source and mainstream. The return of the king: For over a decade, lord of the rings fans have been comparing the books and the movies.

Lord of the rings books vs. Other ones that are different, but not necessarily better include: No, the book is better than the movies.

When you read a book, you might take a day, a week, a month, two months or several months to finish it. (lord of the rings is one novel, not a trilogy.) of course, any adaptation has to change the story, and, in a story as long as lotr, leave things out. The silmarillion (also by tolkien) is much better than lord of the rings, and also goes into significantly more worldbuilding and the first age battles between the elvish races and the valar (and morgoth) and men.

(but i don't know, the lotr books could be amazing.) mar 28, 2013 #13. While there are some changes in sequence, the storyline is well aligned between the two sources. I read the books when i was young.

The filmed version of the tale is a better film than the book version is a book, because the storyteller in the film tells the story better. 5.overall what is your favorite. And they were far from perfect.

The lord of the rings: I'll chime in on loving both. You can read at lunch or while you have a.

I felt the characters were. So based off of the hobbit i'd definitely say the movies right now. The harry potter movies are better, maybe in part due to.

I like the movies a lot, but they're.

I compare Bilbo in the Hobbit movies and the original book